Letter to my MP: objection to compulsory unpaid work

UK Parliament (freefoto.com)

UK Parliament (freefoto.com)Dear Mr Luff,

I am writing to inform you of my opposition to schemes run by the DWP and the government which send people to do unpaid work and threaten sanctions for refusal to attend. I oppose the use of sanctions and removal of benefits of any sort to compel people to take part in unpaid work or to continue in unpaid work. I feel strongly that any such work placement must be entirely voluntary on the part of the job seeker. I understand that these schemes are a core Conservative policy, however I am not satisfied that this policy has majority support from the public.

Please be aware that I oppose ALL such schemes, including the work experience scheme, the compulsory work element of the work programme, the community action programme, sector-based academies, and mandatory work activity. I am sure there are others that I have missed. I find it very offensive to be told by Iain Duncan-Smith and Chris Grayling that “these are not the schemes that people are protesting about” when myself and others are very definitely protesting about all of these schemes. Even the spokesman in the DWP press office whom I spoke to in the course of writing about these schemes made this allegation, and it is simply not true. There is widespread objection to people being made to do unpaid work or face loss of benefits.

I believe that work experience can provide useful skills and training to job seekers however I do not believe that this will be found performing manual labour such as restocking shelves or cleaning floors in a supermarket, or, indeed, being sent out as cleaners to clean people’s homes. Such placements merely make use of job seekers as free labour to subsidise already profitable business but the claimants will not learn many useful skills at all, if any. As such I believe that work experience placements must be limited to those where job seekers are provided with a genuine learning opportunity and they are not displacing other paid workers as has happened in the case of Tesco and other supermarkets. (I have evidence for all of these assertions which I will be pleased to provide if you wish to query them.)

Additionally I must draw your attention to the plight of claimants of Employment and Support Allowance (ESA) who have been placed in the Work Related Activity Group. As things stand and under the welfare reform bill these people, who have been declared not fit to work at the moment but potentially fit to work in the next 2 to 5 years WITH the right support (by one of the designers of ESA) will be mandated to attend the work programme if Atos has decided that they will be fit to work within 3 months. Since a vast number of people are currently waiting for appeals against their placement in the WRAG rather than the support group, and since such appeals are taking a year or more, and since many people have overturned the decision on appeal, it is highly likely that people who are far to sick to work are being made to take part in the work programme and as part of that are being mandated to attend unpaid work placements. This is clearly not right in a society that claims to support those who are too sick to work. As patron of an ME support group you should be aware that many people with ME are being placed in the WRAG and later moved to the ESA support group on appeal, and these people can suffer serious setbacks as a result of being made to participate in the work programme or even work focussed interviews.

Yesterday employment minister Mr Grayling supposedly made concessions to guarantee there would be no use of sanctions on people withdrawing from the work experience scheme. However I have seen the statement yesterday from the minister in which he stated that “The work experience scheme remains and is totally voluntary.” and also that “The sanction regime remains in place.” As I understand it he has not admitted that whatever the rules may be, job seekers are routinely led to believe that placements are mandatory and threatened with loss of benefits if they fail to start or withdraw from the placement. There may be a small technicality here but in practice such work placements are not optional from the point of view of the job seeker. Again, I have evidence of these allegations taken from the DWP’s own documentation and from several people subject to compulsory work which I can forward to you if you wish.

I therefore would like you to make it plain to the employment minister that he must move towards removing all sanctions for failure to attend work experience placements.

Please do not reply to this email with a standard “everything is fine” letter, as I find these to be rather dismissive and I would be grateful if you could address the points that I have raised here.

Yours Sincerely,

Latentexistence

PS

I have heard of cases where job seekers who have declined work experience have been immediately sent for mandatory work activity instead. This seems a vindictive way for job centre advisers to force compliance.

I also have found some of the responses from Iain Duncan Smith, Chris Grayling and David Cameron to be highly offensive. I object to being called “job snobs” “trotskyites” “Anti-capitalist extremists” “unemployed anarchists” and to protests being attributed to the SWP.  These are intended as insults, not arguments, and are not what I expect to hear from government ministers.

Author: Latentexistence

The world is broken and I can't fix it because I am broken. I can, however, rant about it all and this is where I do that when I can get my thoughts together. Most of the time you'll find my words on Twitter rather than here though. I sometimes write for Where's The Benefit too.

5 thoughts on “Letter to my MP: objection to compulsory unpaid work”

  1. What’s all this about WE
    people being “unpaid”: they still get benefits don’t they? Of course there is a
    valid debate to be had about exactly what the hourly rate should be, but to say
    they are “unpaid” is nonsense.

    Re your objections to “compelling”
    people to WE, if one person does not work, someone else has to work extra hours
    (or gets paid less) in order to supply the former with food, fuel, etc. Ergo in
    “compelling” people to work, there is no increase in the total amount of
    compulsion.

    That’s why Trotsky said
    something to the effect that people should work or not eat.

    As for the idea that WE can
    provide training, that is very naïve. Several studies have shown that the sort
    of training associated with WE produces very poor results. See:

    http://ralphanomics.blogspot.com/2012/01/effect-of-temporary-subsidised.html

    It would be nice if people
    sounding off on this subject studied the subject first.

  2. One might stick to one’s own cred if trying to use to to wreck another’s argument.

  3.  This week i have been told that i have to take part in unpaid work experience or recieve sanctions to my benefits. My advisor told me in no uncertain terms that if i failed  in the work placement that i would likely end up homeless and without any benefits.

     Now i suffer from quite severe anxiety/depression caused my rather brutal and sickening things i had experienced while working out in South central Africa, I had always worked for a living, i also if health permitting would happily enter work placement. However even my advisor at A4E readily admits that i would not be able to complete a work placement and advised me to look into disability living allowance.

     I have made good progress over the last 2 years going from not leaving my home and being in a state of medicated “numbness” to actually starting to address the issues i have and confront them. However all of this extra stress and uncertainty is pushing me to become more irratic in my behaviour and mindset. When it is known that busy enviroments, stressful situations and often not being able to leave my home due to my condition; seems i have been set up to fail.

     Sanctions are happening,  the scheme as far as A4E and Nottingham job centre/DWP is mandatory and i feel i am being demonised for being genuinely unwell and not in fit state to work.

    Jon

  4.  Also i would like to add that when they placed me onto the WRAG (Work related assessment Group that a friend phoned DWP about appealing. He was told that unless i Have 6 months to live, or a fatal condition that i would not be placed into the support group and that  appeal was pointless as they were criteria for Support group placements.

    Jon

Comments are closed.