Daily Mail backpedal on DLA attack?

On Friday the Daily Mail published a story with a front page headline “DISABLED BENEFIT? JUST FILL IN A FORM”. On Saturday, a story by the same author appeared inside the paper, this time presenting some of the objections to the first story.

I’m afraid that I remain rather cynical on this. The piece looks to me like a rather hurried climb-down by the same author that wrote the previous story. The tone of the two pieces is completely different; the first one contains many (incorrect) assertions, while the second one simply quotes various objections from charities but asserts nothing. Indeed, the words “claims” and “said” are all over the place in the article including the headline. The article does make an effort to present the correct data about numbers with evidence and amounts claimed but this is still limited to a tiny paragraph more than halfway through. Then look at the prominence given to the two articles – one was a front-page headline and the other was hidden inside the paper.

Ultimately the intention of the writer is betrayed by the choice of final paragraph – a quote from Ian Duncan Smith which again emphasises the lack of checks of permanently disabled recipients of DLA. This emphasis is purely idealogical and in my opinion an absurd stance – checking permanently disabled people so frequently costs a fortune and achieves nothing! My dad isn’t going to re-grow the discs in his spine. Blind people aren’t going to suddenly see. Paralysed people won’t suddenly walk again. Admittedly some people’s health will improve, but for people on DLA that is a rare occurence and could be better served simply by writing to the patients or their GP once a year and asking if their condition has changed.


Author: Latentexistence

The world is broken and I can't fix it because I am broken. I can, however, rant about it all and this is where I do that when I can get my thoughts together. Most of the time you'll find my words on Twitter rather than here though. I sometimes write for Where's The Benefit too.

2 thoughts on “Daily Mail backpedal on DLA attack?”

  1. I agree.  I understand that as I have an invisible and variable condition I will probably be made to reapply every few years.  I get that.  I don’t enjoy it and it feels pointless because all that ever seems to happen is I get worse, but I get it.  What I don’t get is why we should waste tax payers money on chasing after people who are NEVER GOING TO CHANGE.  It seems as futile as banging your head against a brick wall and then paying for the privilege.  Do want Government to be wasteful AND stupid?

  2. They can assess me every six months till the day I take my final gasp, my MS isn’t going to improve nor will I recover. The only thing they will discover is that as the years progress so does my disability. Big clue here; Progressive,Degenerative neurological disorder. Bite me IDS and Co

Comments are closed.